![](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/MM_Bill_Tracker_V5_blank-34.jpg\"){kind=tracking}
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\u201cI never expected that all of the cannabis that they would grow would stay on reservation lands, that they would only be sold on reservation lands.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n By Peter Callaghan, MinnPost<\/strong><\/p>\n Ongoing negotiations between Gov. Tim Walz (D) and a group of Minnesota tribal nations could make the tribes major players in the state\u2019s recreational cannabis industry, both on and off reservation land, including in urban areas.<\/p>\n Walz was directed by last year\u2019s House File 100 to negotiate \u201cin good faith\u201d with any tribes interested in entering the cannabis business, both medical and recreational. While the law acknowledges that sovereign tribes can act on their own land without agreement with the state\u2014and three tribes have either opened or announced plans to open cannabis dispensaries on reservation\u2014the law<\/a> stated that a compact could \u201cproactively address jurisdictional issues related to the regulation of the cannabis industry.\u201d<\/p>\n Walz administration officials say talks are progressing and include discussions of off-reservation cannabis businesses owned by tribes, as well as business interactions between tribal entities and state-licensed businesses. The negotiations involve 10 tribes, though not all are expected to get into cannabis cultivation and sales, said the officials who agreed to speak to MinnPost on condition that their names not be used because negotiations are ongoing. The one tribe not taking part is the Upper Sioux Community.<\/p>\n Messages left for officials representing several of the other tribes involved in the negotiations were not returned in time to be included.<\/p>\n The state is represented by staff from the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), the governor\u2019s office and outside legal counsel Mark Levitan<\/a>, hired to help with the negotiations. The state has not engaged in negotiations for new compacts with tribes for decades and wanted outside legal expertise on cannabis law and tribal relations, which Levitan has, the officials said.<\/p>\n \u201cThese are friendly parties with the goal of getting to yes and making sure the state\u2019s needs and the tribes\u2019 needs are both met by what the statute allows,\u201d one administration official said Monday. An agreement is not expected before the end of the legislative session in two weeks, with the administration officials saying they are aiming toward being ready in time for the launch of the new market.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think we\u2019re behind. I think we\u2019re being deliberate,\u201d the administration official said.<\/p>\n The extent of tribal cannabis operations in the fledgling cannabis industry is the subject of speculation among lawmakers and lobbyists crafting revisions to last year\u2019s sweeping House File 100 that made Minnesota the 23rd state to legalize cannabis for recreational purposes. That is, how would details of any compact change how lawmakers and state regulators scale and stage the market?<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m a little surprised at how slow it\u2019s going,\u201d said Rep. Zack Stephenson, the Coon Rapids DFLer who has been the lead House member on the issue. And his counterpart in the Senate, Burnsville DFL Sen. Lindsey Port, said she hopes negotiations will be completed soon.<\/p>\n Both said they expect tribes\u2014at least the handful that want to get into the legal cannabis business\u2014to be significant players in the new industry. So far, that has meant cultivating cannabis and selling it from on-reservation dispensaries. But both lawmakers said they expect that could expand to include wholesale sales to non-tribal dispensaries, purchase of products by tribal entities as well as creating retail dispensaries on land that is outside what is considered tribally regulated land, which usually means reservations and trust land<\/a> approved for tribal use by the federal government.<\/p>\n Stephenson said he always expected tribes would be \u201cbig actors\u201d in the state cannabis marketplace, including off-reservation wholesale and retail sales.<\/p>\n \u201cI never expected that all of the cannabis that they would grow would stay on reservation lands, that they would only be sold on reservation lands,\u201d Stephenson said.<\/p>\n As to having tribes be able to wholesale cannabis to state-licensed dispensaries, Port added: \u201cI hope so, but I can\u2019t speak to the details being worked out between the governor and the sovereign nations.\u201d She said that while she supports off-reservation retailing by tribes, the details of that are needed soon.<\/p>\n \u201cAs far as retail locations off of tribal lands\u2026those will be taken into consideration of the numbers of licenses that will be granted,\u201d Port said. \u201cIf a number of licenses are granted through compacting, in that case I would assume that OCM will remove that number from the amount that they will grant in total.\u201d<\/p>\n Port said she considers the 11 tribal nations to be what are known in the new law as \u201csocial equity\u201d participants, a term that covers people and neighborhoods that suffered from unequal enforcement of cannabis prohibition over the decades. The law gives social equity applicants\u2014including those historically or currently involved in the illicit cannabis market\u2014some preference for entering the new market.<\/p>\n \u201cMy hope is that those compact conversations will be able to wrap up as soon as possible because the tribes, as sovereign nations, have\u00a0 a unique opportunity in the state of Minnesota,\u201d Port said. \u201cEnsuring that we get that compacting done promptly is, in my mind, critical to ensuring that they also have the \u2018early mover advantage\u2019 that we have discussed throughout the process of social equity applicants having.\u201d<\/p>\n How big a player might tribes be? Stephenson said just three or four tribes have expressed interest.<\/p>\n \u201cThey\u2019ve gotta bring resources to the table. They\u2019ve gotta do all sorts of other stuff to work,\u201d Stephenson said. \u201cIf you look at what Red Lake and White Earth [tribal nations] have done so far in terms of their cultivation, it is not gigantic. Neither of them are as big as either of the two medical companies, for example.\u201d<\/p>\n The administrative officials said that OCM staff are involved in the talks and are aware of what impact the compact results would have on the rest of the market.<\/p>\n \u201cOCM is deeply involved in all of these discussions since they would be the regulatory agency here,\u201d one of the Walz administration officials said. \u201cThey\u2019re tracking everything we talk about and how we are thinking about this as we progress.\u201d The administration believes there will be enough demand for cannabis products that tribal involvement will not take away from non-tribal players.<\/p>\n \u201cThe tribes are well aware of competition and they want to be a good partner,\u201d another administration official said. \u201cWe think there will be enough availability for everyone who wants to be engaged in the market.\u201d<\/p>\n On its webpage<\/a>, OCM describes how the state cannabis law treats tribal nations as \u201camong the strongest in the nation to honor and recognize tribal sovereignty and the authority of Tribal Nations to make decisions about cannabis sales on tribal land.\u201d Under \u201cTribal Partnerships,\u201d it references the compacting requirement in the law.<\/p>\n Tribes with smaller reservations might not be interested in cultivating or perhaps would favor indoor grow operations and not outdoor farms. Others might prefer to purchase cannabis from other growers. There were proposals made earlier in session regarding tribal roles in the market. Rep. Jessica Hanson (DFL-Burnsville) introduced HF 4195<\/a> to set up a pilot project to allow the state\u2019s two medical cannabis providers to sell to tribal governments and tribal cannabis businesses. Hanson said the measure did not get enough support.<\/p>\n Another proposal, circulated but not introduced, would have let social equity cultivators begin growing sooner than others and be allowed to sell to tribes.<\/p>\n Port and Stephenson are already meeting to work out differences between bills passed by the House and Senate. Both, however, agree on the basics of the law\u2014that the state Office of Cannabis Management must provide a way for cultivation of cannabis to begin in the second half of this year and that changes in how licenses are distributed should be made. The latter means that what OCM calls a \u201cvetted lottery\u201d likely will replace a points-driven system based on preparations taken by applicants and whether they qualify as social equity applicants.<\/p>\n Walz said last week that he is aware of moves to get plants in the ground sooner than current law envisions. HF 100 requires that all rules be final before any licenses can be issued by OCM, something it forecasts to be March of 2025.<\/p>\n \u2014 \u201cWe certainly hear people on this,\u201d the governor said last week. \u201cI think there\u2019s some potential there and as of yesterday it sounded pretty optimistic. Maybe we can move something. But as I\u2019ve said, anytime we can start cultivating will be early cultivation since we\u2019ve never had it. I understand the sense of urgency but the arbitrary decision of when it had to be, we\u2019re trying the best we can but we\u2019re not going to cut corners.\u201d<\/p>\n As with other compacts, such as the tribal gambling agreements negotiated in 1989 under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the governor has the authority to reach agreement without legislative scrutiny. House File 100 included direction for the governor to conduct compact talks if any tribes request them.<\/p>\n \u201cThe legislature finds that these agreements will facilitate and promote a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the state and the Tribes regarding the legalization of cannabis,\u201d the law states<\/a>. \u201cSuch cooperative agreements will enhance public health and safety, ensure a lawful and well-regulated cannabis market, encourage economic development, and provide fiscal benefits to both Indian Tribes and the state.\u201d<\/p>\n The law states that the governor cannot require any revenue sharing or right to tax tribally licensed cannabis sales, cannot require state licensing or oversight and cannot require tribes to permit state laws to be enforced on tribally regulated land. It also, at some length, assured that business interactions between tribal entities and state-regulated businesses\u2014as well as interactions between non-tribal customers and tribal businesses\u2014would be legal.<\/p>\n Walz acknowledged in February that some tribes had requested compact negotiations, including sales on tribal trust land\u2014off reservation property.<\/p>\n \u201cSo that still is a gray area,\u201d Walz said. Because of its geographic isolation, the Red Lake tribe has asked about being able to sell off reservation. \u201cSo they\u2019re gonna press the limit as far as they can. And they\u2019re the one who brought that up,\u201d he said. \u201c\u2018We have Red Lake citizens in Minneapolis. Why can\u2019t we set up there?\u2019 So they have raised the issue.\u201d<\/p>\n But the administration officials said the use of tribal trust lands is not a significant part of the talks because those lands are limited in usefulness. Instead, the negotiations have surrounded tribal operations on non-tribal land.<\/p>\n This story was first published by MinnPost.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n Minnesota House Passes Bill Changing Marijuana Social Equity And Licensing Rules<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis \/\/ Side Pocket Images.<\/em><\/p>\n The post Closed-Door Negotiations With Minnesota Governor Could Make Tribal Nations Major Players In State\u2019s Marijuana Market<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\u201cI never expected that all of the cannabis that they would grow would stay on reservation lands, that they would only be sold on reservation lands.\u201d By Peter Callaghan, MinnPost Ongoing negotiations between Gov. Tim Walz (D) and a group of Minnesota tribal nations could make the tribes major playersContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":457,"featured_media":75039,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75038"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/457"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75038"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75040,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75038\/revisions\/75040"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nMarijuana Moment is tracking more than 1,400 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills<\/a> in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters<\/a> pledging at least $25\/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don\u2019t miss any developments.<\/strong>
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/MM_Bill_Tracker_V5_blank-33.jpg\"){kind=tracking}
<\/a>
\nLearn more about our marijuana bill tracker<\/a> and become a supporter on Patreon<\/a> to get access.
\n\u2014<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n
\nRead More: Closed-Door Negotiations With Minnesota Governor Could Make Tribal Nations Major Players In State\u2019s Marijuana Market<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"