{"id":70933,"date":"2023-12-13T05:36:19","date_gmt":"2023-12-13T13:36:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/12\/13\/federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes\/"},"modified":"2023-12-13T19:46:30","modified_gmt":"2023-12-14T03:46:30","slug":"federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/12\/13\/federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Rescheduling Of Marijuana Could Lead To Cascade Of State-Level Changes"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<p>If the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reschedules marijuana to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), experts say the change would not only have big implications for cannabis at the federal level, but could also cause series of legal adjustments in states.<\/p>\n<p>As the result of so-called \u201ctrigger laws,\u201d most U.S. states would either automatically reschedule marijuana to follow a change in its federal status or would begin a process to reclassify the substance. The ripple effect could impact politics, criminal justice and medical marijuana, among other issues.<\/p>\n<p>Broadly, states fall into one of three categories in terms of their response to federal rescheduling. In slightly more than half, a federal scheduling change automatically triggers state-level rescheduling. In others, federal rescheduling would initiate a process requiring further action by the state legislature or a controlling state authority. And about 10 states don\u2019t directly tie their scheduling decisions to\u00a0 drug\u2019s federal status.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s according to Shawn Hauser, an attorney who co-chairs cannabis-focused law firm Vicente LLP\u2019s hemp and cannabinoids department.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe majority of states have a state scheduling procedure automatically triggered by a schedule change\u201d at the federal level, she told Marijuana Moment. \u201cThe state is required under the state law to control the substance in accordance with state law, unless there\u2019s an objection by the state regulatory body.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In Texas, for example, rescheduling would happen automatically under the state\u2019s trigger law. The commissioner of the Department of State Health Services would have 30 days after receiving notice of federal rescheduling to similarly reschedule, unless the commissioner objects.<\/p>\n<p>Among other potential changes, the state-level shift could give Texans broader access to high-THC medical marijuana. Currently patients are limited to products containing no more than one percent THC.<\/p>\n<p>In automatic trigger states where cannabis is currently illegal for all uses, such as Idaho, rescheduling would essentially clear a path for medical marijuana, at least in certain cases.<\/p>\n<p>In states without an automatic rescheduling process, further action would be required from the state legislature or another controlling authority, Hauser said. For example, in Kansas, lawmakers have the ability to make scheduling changes with recommendations from the Board of Pharmacy.<\/p>\n<p>Such state-level rescheduling efforts were on display after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval to Epidiolex, an oral solution of CBD, in 2018. The federal government subsequently moved CBD to Schedule V of the CSA. After that, the maker of Epidiolex, then known as GW Pharmaceuticals (now Jazz Pharmaceuticals), went state-by-state to ensure states made similar scheduling changes at the state level.<\/p>\n<p>Yet other states have laws specifying that action is discretionary. In Virginia, for example, state law says regulators <em>may<\/em> amend rules in order to match scheduling changes at the federal level, but no formal action is required.<\/p>\n<p>As for what effects state-level rescheduling would have on residents, impacts would likely vary significantly based on how the state currently handles marijuana, Hauser said.<\/p>\n<p>In states that already have legal medical or adult-use cannabis, she expects little will change.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think in those states it would be moot,\u201d she said, \u201cbecause those states have already chosen to regulate marijuana less restrictively than federal law, knowing that the federal government likely isn\u2019t going to enforce and pursuant federal enforcement priorities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hauser doubted that states with mature cannabis systems would roll back their laws to adhere to strict Schedule III restrictions. \u201cI think states like Colorado and Washington and others, with mature regulatory models and a mature industry, I don\u2019t think this will turn back the clock on them,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>States without any legal form of marijuana, meanwhile, would likely see at least limited access for medical patients as the eventual result of rescheduling, with the drug regulated more akin to other Schedule III substances, such as ketamine and Tylenol with codeine\u2014at least once additional FDA-approved cannabis medicines become available. The process of FDA approval, however, could take years and require millions of dollars in research and application fees.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond those formal legal changes, Hauser also expects broader state-level rescheduling to have a political impact by fueling the changing conversation around cannabis\u2014among doctors, elected officials, law enforcement and others.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs we\u2019ve seen with the way it\u2019s federally classified,\u201d she said, \u201cthe way it\u2019s classified at the state level colors how doctors look at it, how government officials look at it, how police look at it, parents\u2014everyone.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSchedule III means it has an acknowledgment of medical use and lower potential for abuse,\u201d she continued. \u201cThat\u2019s going to make it a much different conversation with doctors and in health care and in conversations with government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to helping facilitate broader reform around medical marijuana, Hauser said that perspective could also change how law enforcement handles cannabis cases. While she noted that most marijuana crimes are based on volume and not on the drug\u2019s specific schedule, she said prosecutors and sentencing judges might nevertheless take into consideration marijuana\u2019s lower schedule when processing cases.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cViewing cannabis in the lens of Schedule I, it\u2019s shaped prosecutors and it\u2019s shaped judges,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>The changes could also put further pressure on governors to pardon people with past cannabis convictions, especially for simple possession.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen Biden made the announcement to reschedule cannabis, he <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/biden-announces-mass-marijuana-pardons-and-calls-for-cannabis-scheduling-review\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">also pardoned federal prisoners<\/a>\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/who-is-left-behind-by-bidens-marijuana-pardon-immigrants-military-members-and-more\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">which, there are a few<\/a>\u2014and directed state governors to do the same,\u201d Hauser said. \u201cMuch of what needs to happen at the pardon level is at the states.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rescheduling at the state level would provide another opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, as DEA reviews the federal marijuana rescheduling recommendation from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), some opponents have attempted to scuttle the process.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), for one, filed a legislative amendment to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/congress-considers-opposing-amendments-to-protect-legal-marijuana-states-and-block-biden-from-rescheduling-cannabis\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">block the Biden administration from rescheduling cannabis<\/a>. The provision would prevent federal funds from being used to \u201cdeschedule, reschedule, or reclassify marihuana\u201d under the Controlled Substances Act.<\/p>\n<p>Sessions recently led a letter urging DEA to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/14-gop-congressional-lawmakers-tell-dea-to-keep-marijuana-in-schedule-i-and-reject-top-health-agencys-recommendation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201creject\u201d the top federal health agency\u2019s recommendation to reschedule marijuana<\/a>\u00a0and instead keep it in the most restrictive category under the CSA.<\/p>\n<p>In September, two Republican senators introduced a separate bill <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/gop-senators-file-bill-to-block-biden-marijuana-rescheduling-effort-without-congressional-approval\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">that would strip DEA of its rescheduling power<\/a>, preventing all federal agencies from rescheduling cannabis without approval from Congress.<\/p>\n<p>That same month, 14 GOP lawmakers sent a letter <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/14-gop-congressional-lawmakers-tell-dea-to-keep-marijuana-in-schedule-i-and-reject-top-health-agencys-recommendation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">urging DEA to reject the marijuana rescheduling recommendation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>While marijuana rescheduling would not federally legalize access through current state-level medical cannabis programs, it would\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/moving-marijuana-to-schedule-iii-could-have-sweeping-impacts-for-businesses-federal-employees-research-and-more\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">free up research into the plant and have significant implications<\/a>\u00a0for the marijuana industry.<\/p>\n<p>Congressional lawmakers across party lines have applauded the top health agency\u2019s recommendation. Some have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/federal-marijuana-rescheduling-is-just-a-step-on-the-path-to-legalization-congressional-lawmakers-say\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">described it as an important \u201cstep\u201d on the path to federal legalization<\/a>. Others have claimed credit for the move,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/bipartisan-lawmakers-claim-credit-for-biden-administrations-marijuana-rescheduling-recommendation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pointing to their years of advocacy around marijuana reform<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2bz3XhCZrj\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/fda-weighs-new-application-to-approve-mdma-as-first-ever-psychedelic-medicine-for-ptsd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">FDA Weighs New Application To Approve MDMA As First-Ever Psychedelic Medicine For PTSD<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p \/>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Federal Rescheduling Of Marijuana Could Lead To Cascade Of State-Level Changes<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nRead More: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Federal Rescheduling Of Marijuana Could Lead To Cascade Of State-Level Changes<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reschedules marijuana to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), experts say the change would not only have big implications for cannabis at the federal level, but could also cause series of legal adjustments in states. As the result of so-called \u201ctrigger laws,\u201d<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/12\/13\/federal-rescheduling-of-marijuana-could-lead-to-cascade-of-state-level-changes\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70933"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70933"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70933\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70934,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70933\/revisions\/70934"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70933"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70933"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70933"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}