{"id":70373,"date":"2023-11-22T06:01:41","date_gmt":"2023-11-22T14:01:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/11\/22\/rhode-island-marijuana-regulators-seek-data-to-better-define-social-equity-program-eligibility\/"},"modified":"2023-11-22T19:47:03","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T03:47:03","slug":"rhode-island-marijuana-regulators-seek-data-to-better-define-social-equity-program-eligibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/11\/22\/rhode-island-marijuana-regulators-seek-data-to-better-define-social-equity-program-eligibility\/","title":{"rendered":"Rhode Island Marijuana Regulators Seek Data To Better Define Social Equity Program Eligibility"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

\u201cThis essentially says that if you\u2019re a wealthy person who wants to engage in the cannabis industry\u2014you will now get additional support from the state.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Current<\/strong><\/p>\n

What constitutes a community that is disproportionately impacted by the war on drugs?<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the question Rhode Island\u2019s Cannabis Control Commission hopes to better define as it works on initial regulations for recreational dispensaries. To do so, Chairperson Kimberly Ahern said at the commission\u2019s November 3 meeting she would request data from state and federal agencies on which Rhode Islanders would qualify for one of the 12 special licenses available under the law.<\/p>\n

Rhode Island\u2019s cannabis law sets a cap of 24 retail licenses. Of those, six are reserved for social equity applicants and another six are reserved for worker-owned cooperatives.<\/p>\n

The statute on social equity includes many definitions on what constitutes a disproportionately impacted area. Under the Rhode Island Cannabis Act, it can be determined by federal poverty level, unemployment rate, how many kids in a free lunch program and historic arrest rates.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe whole idea is to frame where these individuals might be,\u201d Ahern said in an interview. \u201cBut before we can get there, we need all the data in front of us.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ahern said she did not set a deadline on when the commission needs that data. \u201cBut we\u2019ll check in with agencies to see what\u2019s realistic,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

The Cannabis Control Commission\u2019s data request is one that some marijuana advocates and prospective dispensary owners are happy to see. Many said the definitions are filled with loopholes that can be exploited by those who don\u2019t need the help<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Rep. David Morales, a Providence Democrat, noted that dispensary applicants can be considered for a social equity license so long as more than half their workforce come from a \u201cdisproportionately impacted area.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis essentially says that if you\u2019re a wealthy person who wants to engage in the cannabis industry\u2014you will now get additional support from the state,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Such language is not included in Massachusetts\u2019 cannabis law, said Chris Fevry, who serves on that state\u2019s Cannabis Social Equity Advisory Board.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat needs to be stripped out entirely because it\u2019s going to be abused,\u201d he said of the ownership wording in the Rhode Island law.<\/p>\n

Fevry, who grew up in Providence, said Massachusetts does not have a set social equity license type for dispensaries. Instead, the Bay State issues licenses for delivery or social consumption (think a cannabis cafe), which Fevry said are given exclusively to social equity applicants. There is also no cap on the number of social equity retailers, he added.<\/p>\n

Massachusetts\u2019s social equity program, Fevry explained, is strictly state support through education and skill-based training.<\/p>\n

State support, Morales said, should be given to owners who come from these communities.<\/p>\n

\u201cOtherwise they\u2019re going to be relegated to budtenders or lower-paying jobs in the dispensary, all for the purpose of allowing their boss to take advantage of social equity status,\u201d Morales said.<\/p>\n

If the Cannabis Control Commission is to have just one set definition, Morales wants the three-member panel to focus on Rhode Islanders who were incarcerated on cannabis charges.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere needs to be people with past history in this,\u201d agreed Raquel Baker, who works for the PVD Flowers Cooperative, a cannabis dispensary that registered with the Secretary of State\u2019s office in February.<\/p>\n

Andre Dev, who also helped found PVD Flowers, said picking someone who was directly impacted by the War on Drugs is the best way to try and remedy mistakes of the past. It can also build up those very communities that were once overpoliced, he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt builds wealth and an incentive to care about customers in that community,\u201d Dev said.<\/p>\n

Fund would assist social equity applicants<\/strong><\/p>\n

Should the commission prioritize those who were formerly incarcerated, Dev said the state needs to make sure those potential dispensary owners are given the tools and capital to succeed.<\/p>\n

Under the Rhode Island Cannabis Act, social equity applicants can receive some assistance from a program \u201cfor business assistance and license application benefits\u201d from a designated fund. As of November 3, Ahern said<\/a> the fund had $1,013,500.<\/p>\n

\u201cUntil the advisory board and the commission issue any regulations on this\u2014there\u2019d be nothing coming out of that fund,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Massachusetts has established a similar fund but as of November, no money was in it.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re a little bit behind in that area,\u201d Fevry said.<\/p>\n

Dev said he was surprised to hear about Rhode Island\u2019s total social equity funds, but doubted if that is enough to help all six social equity applicants mandated by the law. The Rhode Island cannabis law notes that except for $125,000 initial license fee, all remaining fees collected by the state are to be placed in a \u201cmedical marijuana licensing account.\u201d If all 24 dispensaries were approved, that would add $3 million more to the fund.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat could open two and half dispensaries,\u201d Dev said. \u201cIf you\u2019re lucky.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dev and Baker suggested the state divert more revenues from fees and fines to the fund.<\/p>\n

Use of the money, Dev suggested, should be similar to the Massachusetts program and provide \u201cprofessional infrastructure\u201d for formerly incarcerated Rhode Islanders, like building resumes and teaching them about financing.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think we can do a lot of creative things with that fund,\u201d he said. \u201cWe have this great opportunity.\u201d<\/p>\n

This story was first published by Rhode Island Current.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Rhode Island Cannabis Commission Chair Downplays Errors In State\u2019s Monthly Marijuana Sales Data<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis \/\/ Side Pocket Images.<\/em><\/p>\n

The post Rhode Island Marijuana Regulators Seek Data To Better Define Social Equity Program Eligibility<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n


\n
\nRead More: Rhode Island Marijuana Regulators Seek Data To Better Define Social Equity Program Eligibility<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cThis essentially says that if you\u2019re a wealthy person who wants to engage in the cannabis industry\u2014you will now get additional support from the state.\u201d By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Current What constitutes a community that is disproportionately impacted by the war on drugs? That\u2019s the question Rhode Island\u2019s CannabisContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":457,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70373"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/457"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70373"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70373\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70374,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70373\/revisions\/70374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}