{"id":69208,"date":"2023-10-11T13:18:13","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T21:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/10\/11\/texas-activists-say-they-have-enough-signatures-to-put-marijuana-decriminalization-on-lubbock-ballot-but-plan-to-collect-more-in-final-push\/"},"modified":"2023-10-11T19:46:02","modified_gmt":"2023-10-12T03:46:02","slug":"texas-activists-say-they-have-enough-signatures-to-put-marijuana-decriminalization-on-lubbock-ballot-but-plan-to-collect-more-in-final-push","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/10\/11\/texas-activists-say-they-have-enough-signatures-to-put-marijuana-decriminalization-on-lubbock-ballot-but-plan-to-collect-more-in-final-push\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas Activists Say They Have Enough Signatures To Put Marijuana Decriminalization On Lubbock Ballot, But Plan To Collect More In Final Push"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Texas activists say they have secured enough signatures to put a local marijuana decriminalization initiative on the ballot in the city of Lubbock<\/a> if lawmakers there do not enact the reform legislatively.<\/p>\n

The committee behind the initiative filed paperwork for the Freedom Act Lubbock ordinance with the city secretary in August, and on Wednesday announced that that they\u2019ve since gathered about 8,800 signatures. They only need roughly 4,800 valid signatures by October 17 to qualify, and the plan is to turn in about 10,000 by the deadline to ensure success.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are extremely proud of all of the volunteers on our team, and everyone else who is helping us collect signatures,\u201d Adam Hernandez, communications chair for Lubbock Compact, said in a press release, first reported<\/a> by Everything Lubbock.<\/p>\n

The campaign Ground Game Texas\u2014which has led the charge on several successful local decriminalization measures throughout the state and is playing an advisory role in the Lubbock effort\u2014also recently released a report<\/a>\u00a0with data showing thousands of cannabis-related arrests in the city, and how Black and brown people are disproportionately impacted by that criminalization compared to white people, despite comparable rates of marijuana usage.<\/p>\n

For example, Black people represent just eight percent of the city\u2019s population\u2014but they account for 29 percent of marijuana-related arrests, the report found.<\/p>\n

\n

Lubbock Compact has two scheduled events in the next week to shore up additional signatures to meet their 10,000 goal. Hernandez\u2019s group advised voters in the city that more signatures are needed even after reaching the petitioning milestone \u201cbecause some will be thrown out for various reasons, and we want to make sure we have the required amount of valid signatures.\u201d<\/p>\n

Activists also \u201cneed to show city leaders how much support this petition has,\u201d<\/a> he said.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because this is not a direct ballot initiative process. It\u2019s two-parted, and a successful signature turn-in will first require the Lubbock City Council to take up the issue. If legislators don\u2019t enact decriminalization, the proposal will go on the ballot for voters to decide.<\/p>\n

Hernandez told Marijuana Moment in August that activists \u201cfully anticipate\u201d lawmakers will vote against the reform given the \u201cpolitical climate\u201d in the conservative town, but it\u2019d be \u201cgreat\u201d if they enacted it in a surprise move.<\/p>\n

\n

Under the proposal, local police would be prohibited from making arrests or citations to adults in possession of up to four ounces of cannabis, unless there\u2019s a binding state or federal court order against the policy. If that does happen, the initiative says the \u201cCity\u2019s policy shall be to make enforcement of Class A and Class B misdemeanor marijuana possession its lowest enforcement priority.\u201d<\/p>\n

The text of the measure says that it\u2019s meant to \u201cpromote the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of Lubbock.\u201d Enacting the reform is in the interest of \u201ccarefully allocating scarce city resources, reducing the risk of discriminatory enforcement practices, and focusing city resources on the highest priority public safety concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lubbock would be the second largest city by population to enact the reform. It would join cities including\u00a0Austin<\/a>,\u00a0Delton, Elgin, Harker Heights, Killeen and San Marcos<\/a> that were largely led by Ground Game Texas.<\/p>\n

A more recent\u00a0decriminalization measure that went before voters in San Antonio<\/a>\u00a0in May was overwhelmingly defeated, but that proposal also included provisions to prevent enforcement of abortion restrictions.<\/p>\n

Advocates have faced issues in certain jurisdictions where voters approved decriminalization.<\/p>\n

Shortly after voters in Harker Heights approved their measure, the city council overturned the ordinance over concerns that it conflicted with state law. But\u00a0activists collected signatures for another initiative<\/a>\u00a0and successfully repealed the repeal in May.<\/p>\n

The Killeen City Council temporarily paused implementation of its local voter-approved ordinance, arguing that there were legal concerns that lawmakers needed to sort through before giving it their approval, which they eventually did. But in April, Bell County\u00a0filed<\/a>\u00a0a lawsuit challenging the policy.<\/p>\n

At the state-level this session, the Texas House of Representatives passed a series of bills to decriminalize marijuana, facilitate expungements and allow chronic pain patients to access medical cannabis as an opioid alternative. But\u00a0they ultimately stalled out in the Senate<\/a>, which has been a theme for cannabis reform measures in the conservative legislature over several sessions.<\/p>\n

The House\u00a0passed similar cannabis decriminalization proposals<\/a>\u00a0during the past two legislative sessions, in 2021 and 2019.<\/p>\n

Separately, a Texas Democratic senator brought the issue of marijuana legalization to the Senate floor earlier in May, seeking to attach to an unrelated resolution an amendment that would\u2019ve allowed Texans to vote on ending prohibition at the ballot box. But\u00a0the symbolic proposal was ultimately shut down<\/a>. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) agreed to another member\u2019s point of order, deeming the cannabis amendment not germane to the broader legislation.<\/p>\n

Nearly\u00a0three in four Texas voters (72 percent) support decriminalizing marijuana<\/a>, according to a University of Texas\/Texas Politics Project poll last year. More than half (55 percent), meanwhile, said they\u2019re in favor of broader legalization. Seventeen percent said it shouldn\u2019t be legal at all.<\/p>\n

In March, the same institution similarly showed that a majority of Texas voters feel that\u00a0the state\u2019s marijuana laws should be \u201cless strict.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Marijuana Consumers Who Caught COVID Had \u2018Better Outcomes And Mortality\u2019 Than Nonusers, Study Finds<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

The post Texas Activists Say They Have Enough Signatures To Put Marijuana Decriminalization On Lubbock Ballot, But Plan To Collect More In Final Push<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n


\n
\nRead More: Texas Activists Say They Have Enough Signatures To Put Marijuana Decriminalization On Lubbock Ballot, But Plan To Collect More In Final Push<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Texas activists say they have secured enough signatures to put a local marijuana decriminalization initiative on the ballot in the city of Lubbock if lawmakers there do not enact the reform legislatively. The committee behind the initiative filed paperwork for the Freedom Act Lubbock ordinance with the city secretary inContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":458,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69208"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/458"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69208"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69209,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69208\/revisions\/69209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}