{"id":61001,"date":"2023-01-21T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-01-21T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/01\/21\/feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products\/"},"modified":"2023-01-21T17:45:16","modified_gmt":"2023-01-22T01:45:16","slug":"feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/01\/21\/feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products\/","title":{"rendered":"Feds Seek Warning Labels On Regulated Cannabis Products"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<p>The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending that states require cannabis warning labels on all marijuana products that warn drivers of the risks of impaired driving, writing in a report released last week that impairment from drugs, \u201cespecially cannabis, is a growing concern that needs to be addressed.\u201d The agency noted that while dozens of states have legalized sales of cannabis, the continued prohibition of marijuana at the national level prevents the federal government from setting a national labeling requirement.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ntsb.gov\/safety\/safety-studies\/Documents\/SRR2202.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the NTSB report<\/a>, released on January 12, the agency wrote that researchers have determined that alcohol is the most commonly detected substance in impaired driving incidents, followed by cannabis. They also found that while alcohol is most often detected alone, cannabis was most often detected in combination with alcohol or other drugs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve long known about the devastating impact of alcohol-impaired driving, but this report shows that impairment from other drugs, especially cannabis, is a growing concern that needs to be addressed,\u201d NTSB member Tom Chapman <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ntsb.gov\/news\/press-releases\/Pages\/NR20230112.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">said in a statement from the agency<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The report observed that the states that have legalized cannabis don\u2019t have uniform labeling regulations. While many states require some form of warning label on regulated cannabis products, several states don\u2019t specifically mandate warnings that include the dangers of driving while impaired, the agency maintains.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAn NTSB analysis of laws in the 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, identified 23 jurisdictions where cannabis sales are legal but where cannabis label requirements are not required or are inadequate,\u201d the report notes. \u201cThis includes 12 jurisdictions that have no driving-related label requirements, 4 that have label requirements for only certain cannabis products, and 7 whose labeling requirements do not explicitly warn against driving after cannabis use.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Although the agency acknowledged that it\u2019s not clear if labels warning of the risks of <a href=\"https:\/\/cannabisnow.com\/driving-high-is-illegal-but-what-is-driving-high\/\">driving while impaired<\/a> by cannabis would influence drivers\u2019 behavior or improve safety on the nation\u2019s roadways, the NTSB recommended in its report that all states that have legalized cannabis should mandate warning labels on regulated cannabis products.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe NTSB concludes that including driving-related warnings on cannabis products, similar to those on alcohol and many prescription and OTC drugs, would increase awareness of the risks of cannabis-impaired driving,\u201d the agency wrote in its report. \u201cTherefore, the NTSB recommends that the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the 21 states where cannabis use is legal but driving-related cannabis warning labels are not required or are inadequate require a warning label on cannabis products advising users not to drive after cannabis use due to its impairing effects.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4 id=\"h-ntsb-report-may-be-flawed\"><strong>NTSB Report May Be Flawed<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p>But Andrea A. Golan, an attorney with the cannabis law firm Vicente Sederberg and a member of the practice\u2019s Regulatory Compliance and Hemp and Cannabinoids Departments, disputes some of the report\u2019s findings, writing in an email to Cannabis Now that some of the information presented in it is inaccurate.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think to some extent, this report lacks knowledge of state cannabis laws,\u201d Golan wrote. \u201cFootnote 92 lists jurisdictions with no driving-related label requirements and lists seven states that don\u2019t explicitly warn against driving after cannabis use, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. This is simply not accurate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Golan cited the warnings required in Arizona, California and Colorado, noting that others could also have similar labeling requirements. She added that while investigating the 12 states alleged to have no labeling requirement is warranted, most states with legal medical marijuana or adult-use cannabis have regulations requiring impaired driving warnings similar to the government warning mandated for alcohol. Golan agreed that there are risks associated with driving while impaired by cannabis, but she questioned whether amending labeling requirements is the most effective way to address the issue.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMore warranted is educating the consumer,\u201d she wrote. \u201cFor the inexperienced user, they may not know when the effects will kick-in, how long the effects last, or understand the extent of impairing effects. Here, additional safety advisory language educating the consumer on the effects of consumption would be warranted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Justin Kahn CEO and co-founder of Reepher, a company that offers coverage for costs related to cannabis-related DUIs, also questioned the NTSB\u2019s recommendation for warning labels, noting that he is unaware of any data showing they are an effective deterrent to impaired driving. He added that moving to uniform labeling requirements among the states with legal cannabis would be a hardship with small businesses already dealing with strict regulations and high taxes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSimilar labeling requirements exist for alcohol, and the measurable impact on intoxicated driving has been little to nothing,\u201d Kahn says. \u201cChanges in labeling requirements are burdensome for small businesses, requiring capital investment to change packaging design, without demonstrating a benefit to society.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The NTSB also included other recommendations to improve safety on the nation\u2019s streets and highways, including the standardization of toxicology testing for the detection of drug use and a call for research on how to improve compliance with driving-related warnings on prescription and over-the-counter drugs that have the potential to impair driving.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cImpaired driving leads to tragedy every day on our nation\u2019s roads, but it doesn\u2019t have to,\u201d said NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy. \u201cTo create a truly safe system\u2014one where impaired driving is a relic of the past\u2014states and federal agencies must implement our recommendations, and fast. Further complacency is inexcusable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/cannabisnow.com\/feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products\/\">Feds Seek Warning Labels On Regulated Cannabis Products<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/cannabisnow.com\">Cannabis Now<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nRead More: <a href=\"https:\/\/cannabisnow.com\/feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Feds Seek Warning Labels On Regulated Cannabis Products<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending that states require cannabis warning labels on all marijuana products that warn drivers of the risks of impaired driving, writing in a report released last week that impairment from drugs, \u201cespecially cannabis, is a growing concern that needs to be addressed.\u201d The agency<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2023\/01\/21\/feds-seek-warning-labels-on-regulated-cannabis-products\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":381,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[50,327,2541,90,65,16835,420,12707],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61001"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/381"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61001"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61002,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61001\/revisions\/61002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}