![](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Screen-Shot-2022-12-22-at-10.58.28-AM-1024x805-2.png\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
A new analysis of a massive dataset of medical marijuana patient records from across the U.S. suggests that states with restrictive eligibility criteria are likely \u201cdeterring patients from seeking the medication they need\u201d and compromising access to information on why people use cannabis.<\/p>\n
Nugg MD, a cannabis technology company that links people to doctors via telemedicine for medical cannabis recommendations, shared the results of the analysis exclusively with Marijuana Moment. The dataset was based on more than 210,000 anonymized patient records.<\/p>\n
One of the key findings concerns health conditions that people cite as the reason for seeking out medical cannabis. State programs vary in what is considered a qualifying condition for marijuana, with some restricting it to a specific list of illnesses and others giving doctors discretion to recommend cannabis for whatever maladies they see fit.<\/p>\n
The report found that, across the U.S., most people receive medical marijuana recommendations for chronic pain (26.3 percent), anxiety (18.9 percent) and post-traumatic stress disorder (12.4 percent).<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Screen-Shot-2022-12-22-at-10.58.28-AM-1024x805-1.png\")
<\/p>\nVia NuggMD.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Notably, about eight percent of patients cited \u201cunlisted condition,\u201d the data shows.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis could be due to the patient\u2019s primary condition not being considered a qualifying condition in some states and thus not included in our selection of conditions,\u201d NuggMD\u2019s Alexandra Arnett wrote in the report. \u201cLikewise, the symptoms they seek to treat using medical cannabis may not have a specific diagnosis.\u201d<\/p>\n
A regional breakdown of the data shows significant variation in the conditions that patients say they use cannabis to treat. While anxiety affects about about 10 percent of the national population, only 2 percent of patients in the Midwest list it as the reason for a medical cannabis, compared to nearly half of the patient population in other regions.<\/p>\n
States where doctors are empowered to recommend marijuana for any condition also saw higher rates of patients listing \u201cother condition\u201d in their pre-evaluations.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis suggests that states with fewer qualifying conditions may be 1) deterring patients from seeking the medication they need, or 2) reducing the accuracy of available data by forcing patients in need of medical cannabis to select a comorbidity rather than the primary ailment for which they were seeking an evaluation,\u201d the report says. \u201cA majority of patients in our study listed multiple conditions, which can be expected as many conditions exist co-morbidly.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFurther research is required to better understand the causes of these variations,\u201d it says. \u201cSuch research should seek a greater balance in the number of records reviewed from state to state and include in-person evaluations as well as telehealth data.\u201d<\/p>\n
There was additional variation in listed conditions based on the age of the patient, with people under 21 far more likely to seek cannabis for anorexia, for example, and those 51 and older receiving recommendations related to cancer.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Screen-Shot-2022-12-22-at-10.59.24-AM-1024x684-1.png\")
<\/p>\nVia NuggMD.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cPatients, practitioners, and policymakers can all benefit from gaining access to more\u2014and more complete\u2014information regarding medical cannabis and the conditions it is being used to treat,\u201d the report concludes.<\/p>\n
\u201cAccess to information about medical cannabis and specific conditions can help these individuals make better, more informed decisions about their health,\u201d it says. \u201cUnfortunately, the data we currently have is limited, and research, particularly in the United States, is restricted due to the plant\u2019s status as a Schedule I drug. In addition, decades of negative propaganda toward cannabis and those who use cannabis are still being dismantled by advocates and patients.\u201d<\/p>\n
While advocates want to see marijuana federally legalized, President Joe Biden did sign a bill this month that\u2019s expected to streamline cannabis research<\/a>. And in October, he directed an administrative review into the federal scheduling of marijuana<\/a>.<\/p>\n A bipartisan group of 29 congressional lawmakers from both the House and Senate sent a letter to Biden on Thursday, asking that he formally back federal marijuana legalization<\/a> as the administration carries out the scheduling review.<\/p>\n \u201cThe evidence here is clear: medical cannabis works. It provides relief for a wide variety of conditions,\u201d NuggMD co-founder Alex Milligan said in a press release. \u201cMore importantly, it\u2019s giving patients an alternative to dangerously addictive, often deadly pharmaceuticals. More than a century of disinformation and propaganda peddled by cannabis foes does not change these facts.\u201d<\/p>\n Read the full study on medical cannabis patient data below:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n Bipartisan Group Of 29 Congressional Lawmakers Pushes Biden To Back Marijuana Legalization<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n The post States That Restrict Medical Marijuana Qualifying Conditions Are \u2018Deterring\u2019 Patients And Compromising Data, Analysis Of 210K+ Records Suggests<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n
A new analysis of a massive dataset of medical marijuana patient records from across the U.S. suggests that states with restrictive eligibility criteria are likely \u201cdeterring patients from seeking the medication they need\u201d and compromising access to information on why people use cannabis. Nugg MD, a cannabis technology company thatContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":458,"featured_media":59774,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15462],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59773"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/458"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59773"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59775,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59773\/revisions\/59775"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/59774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\nRead More: States That Restrict Medical Marijuana Qualifying Conditions Are \u2018Deterring\u2019 Patients And Compromising Data, Analysis Of 210K+ Records Suggests<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"