![](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Screen-Shot-2022-04-19-at-8.14.13-AM-1024x715-2.png\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Three in four South Carolina Republican primary voters say they support legalizing medical marijuana, according to a new poll.<\/p>\n
The survey from Benchmark Research asked GOP voters in the state whether they favor \u201callowing patients who suffer from an approved list of conditions to have access to medical marijuana if approved by their doctor.\u201d<\/p>\n
And as a Senate-passed medical cannabis bill heads to the House floor<\/a>, the poll found that 76 percent of people who are registered to vote in the Republican primary election on June 14 back the reform. That\u2019s compared to just 17 percent who oppose the policy change and eight percent who are unsure.<\/p>\n The poll, which was first reported<\/a> by FITSNews, also showed majority GOP support for medical marijuana legalization in seven major areas of the state, ranging from 67 percent in Augusta and Columbia to 91 percent in Savannah.<\/p>\n The survey involved interviews with 350 South Carolina Republican primary voters from April 8-11, and has a margin of error of +\/- 4.9 percentage points.<\/p>\n Support for medical marijuana legalization among South Carolina residents has been notably stable. A 2018 Benchmark Research poll similarly found 72 percent support for the reform overall, including nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of Republicans.<\/p>\n Via Benchmark Research and FITSNews.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The latest results are welcome news for Sen. Tom Davis (R), the sponsor of the Senate-passed \u201cCompassionate Care Act.\u201d<\/p>\n That legislation would allow patients with qualifying conditions to possess and purchase cannabis products from licensed dispensaries. Smokable products, as well as home cultivation of cannabis by patients or their caretakers, would be prohibited. Simply possessing the plant form of cannabis could be punished as a misdemeanor.<\/p>\n \u2014 Qualifying conditions for medical cannabis include cancer, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, glaucoma, Crohn\u2019s disease, sickle cell anemia, ulcerative colitis, cachexia or wasting syndrome, autism, nausea in homebound or end-of-life patients, muscle spasms, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Terminal patients with less than a year to live would also qualify. However, regulators would be authorized to add additional conditions in the future.<\/p>\n The bill advanced out of the Senate in February<\/a>, and it\u2019s since moved through a key House committee and is now pending action on the House floor.<\/p>\n Davis said in January that House Speaker Jay Lucas (R) agreed to\u00a0\u201callow the bill to go through the House process\u201d<\/a> if it advanced through the Senate, but a spokesperson late said that \u201cSen. Davis doesn\u2019t speak for Speaker Lucas.\u201d<\/p>\n An earlier version of the legislation was prefiled in late 2020 and passed out of the Senate Medical Affairs Committee<\/a>\u00a0last March, but a lone senator blocked it from reaching the chamber floor in 2021. Since then, Davis has redoubled his efforts to get the bill across the finish line, arguing that South Carolina voters are ready what he\u2019s repeatedly called\u00a0\u201cthe most conservative medical cannabis bill in the country.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n A House subcommittee that advanced the bill last month separately approved another measure that was amended to add marijuana to a list of investigational drugs<\/a>\u00a0that patients could lawfully access during epidemic or pandemic outbreaks.<\/p>\n Gov. Henry McMaster (R) said in February that it was too early to comment on the Davis proposal, as changes were still being made by lawmakers. \u201cThis is one that\u2019s going to depend on a lot of things,\u201d he told<\/a>\u00a0a local FOX station, adding that he\u2019ll wait to see the final version before deciding whether he would potentially sign or veto the bill if if were to arrive on his desk.<\/p>\n The bill would also allow access among patients with \u201cany chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition for which an opioid is currently or could be prescribed by a physician based on generally accepted standards of care,\u201d for example severe or persistent pain.<\/p>\n Medical marijuana would be subject to the state\u2019s six percent sales tax, and local jurisdictions would be able to levy an additional tax.<\/p>\n Rather than have conventional medical marijuana dispensaries that are in place in other legal states, the bill stipulates that there would be so-called cannabis pharmacies. The facilities would be required to have a pharmacist on site at all times, and the South Carolina Board of Pharmacy would promulgate business regulations.<\/p>\n People with felony-level drug convictions would also be prevented from participating in the new industry for a period of 10 years under the proposal.<\/p>\n In-state businesses would also receive licensing priority when the market in established, with the intent being to prevent multi-state operators from dominating the industry.<\/p>\n Under the bill, 75 percent of tax revenue after expenditures would go to the state\u2019s general fund, with another 10 percent going to drug use disorder treatment service providers, five percent going to state law enforcement, and the remainder going to cannabis research and drug education.<\/p>\n For the initial rollout, regulators would approve 15 cannabis cultivators, 30 processing facilities, a cannabis pharmacy for every 20 pharmacies in the state, five testing laboratories and four cannabis transporters. Lawmakers, rather than regulators, would be authorized to approve additional license types.<\/p>\n Local governments could ban medical cannabis businesses from operating in their jurisdictions under the amended bill, but otherwise the it says that local land use and zoning burdens \u201cshould be no greater for a cannabis-based business than for any other similar business.\u201d<\/p>\n The state Department of Health and Environmental Control would oversee licensing and other regulations of the new industry. A newly established Medical Cannabis Advisory Board would be in charge of adding or removing qualifying conditions. The board would meet at least once per year and be led by a governor-appointed chairperson.<\/p>\n Davis has championed medical marijuana in South Carolina since 2014, and at a rally earlier this year, he brought out a binder that he said contained eight years of research into the issue. He said he would use the information to \u201ctake on every single argument that has been raised in opposition to this bill, and I\u2019m going to show that they cannot stand in the way of facts and evidence.\u201d<\/p>\n He\u2019s also continued to push back against opposition to cannabis legalization from his own party, for example calling out an attack ad that was paid for by the South Carolina Republican Party.<\/p>\n The state GOP organization separately\u00a0slammed a federal legalization bill<\/a>\u00a0from U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican who represents South Carolina in Congress.<\/p>\n A former White House chief of staff under President Donald Trump also recently\u00a0called out his home state South Carolina Republican Party<\/a> for opposing the medical marijuana bill. Mick Mulvaney, Trump\u2019s top aide for more than a year and a former congressman, called the legislation \u201csomething that merits discussion and reasoned analysis,\u201d even if it\u2019s not a proposal that is conventionally considered a conservative priority.<\/p>\n Davis referred to the maneuvers by his own party as \u201cthe elephant in the room\u201d on the Senate floor\u00a0as debate on the floor kicked off in January<\/a>, saying he was offended by the misinformation and planned to rebut every misleading claim the group made.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m going to go through every single legal argument that\u2019s been put up there\u2014lack of medical evidence, unintended social consequences\u2014and take them all up and discuss them and refute them,\u201d the senator said at the time.<\/p>\n A separate poll released last February found that South Carolina voters support legalizing medical marijuana<\/a>\u00a0by a five-to-one ratio. But the state does not have a citizen-led initiative process that has empowered voters in other states to get the policy change enacted.<\/p>\n Also in 2018, 82 percent of voters in the state\u2019s Democratic primary election\u00a0voted in favor of medical cannabis legalization<\/a>\u00a0in a nonbinding ballot advisory vote.<\/p>\n Lawmakers\u00a0prefiled four marijuana measures for the 2019 session<\/a>, but they did not advance.<\/p>\n Davis said last year that if the legislature didn\u2019t advance the reform, he\u2019d propose a bill to put the question of medical marijuana legalization to voters<\/a>\u00a0through a referendum.<\/p>\n Marijuana Legalization Tied To \u2018Significant Reductions\u2019 In Prescription Drug Use, Researchers Find<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n Photo courtesy of Brian Shamblen<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n The post Three In Four South Carolina GOP Voters Support Medical Marijuana As House Floor Debate Approaches, Poll Finds<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Three in four South Carolina Republican primary voters say they support legalizing medical marijuana, according to a new poll. The survey from Benchmark Research asked GOP voters in the state whether they favor \u201callowing patients who suffer from an approved list of conditions to have access to medical marijuana ifContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":458,"featured_media":54311,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54310"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/458"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54310"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54312,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54310\/revisions\/54312"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Screen-Shot-2022-04-19-at-8.14.13-AM-1024x715-1.png\")
<\/p>\n
\nMarijuana Moment is already tracking more than 1,000 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills<\/a> in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters<\/a> pledging at least $25\/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don\u2019t miss any developments.<\/strong>
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MM_Bill_Tracker_V5_blank-43.jpg\"){kind=tracking}
<\/a>
\nLearn more about our marijuana bill tracker<\/a> and become a supporter on Patreon<\/a> to get access.
\n\u2014<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n
\n
\nRead More: Three In Four South Carolina GOP Voters Support Medical Marijuana As House Floor Debate Approaches, Poll Finds<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"