{"id":50618,"date":"2021-10-20T11:26:11","date_gmt":"2021-10-20T19:26:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2021\/10\/20\/usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes\/"},"modified":"2021-10-20T13:45:40","modified_gmt":"2021-10-20T21:45:40","slug":"usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2021\/10\/20\/usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes\/","title":{"rendered":"USPS Releases Final Rule Banning Mailing Of Hemp, CBD And Marijuana Vapes"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) on Wednesday released its final rule on the mailability of vapes, asserting that even devices designed for federally legal hemp derivatives like CBD generally cannot be shipped through the U.S. mail.<\/p>\n<p>The agency has been <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/usps-wants-hemp-and-cbd-vape-companies-to-prepare-for-upcoming-mailing-restrictions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">developing the regulations to comply<\/a> with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/congressional-ban-on-mailing-e-cigarettes-appears-to-cover-marijuana-vapes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a bill passed by Congress last year<\/a> that is mostly aimed at stopping nicotine vaping devices from being mailed\u2014though it has broader implications. Despite significant public comment on an earlier proposed version of the rules that urged USPS not to interpret the law in a way that restricts hemp businesses, the agency ultimately said that cannabis vapes fit the definition of what lawmakers moved to ban.<\/p>\n<p>There are some exceptions, but stakeholders are disappointed by the final rule.<\/p>\n<p>During public comment, some argued that the bill was specifically meant to restrict mailing of nicotine-based vapes. But while the legislation refers to limitations on \u201celectronic nicotine delivery systems,\u201d or ENDS, it defines that term as \u201cany electronic device that, through an aerosolized solution, delivers nicotine, flavor, <em>or any other substance<\/em> to the user inhaling from the device.\u201d (Italicized emphasis added.)<\/p>\n<p>USPS explained in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/public-inspection\/2021-22787\/treatment-of-e-cigarettes-in-the-mail\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rule<\/a>, which is set to be published in the Federal Register on Thursday, that by the letter of the law, that includes hemp and marijuana vapes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt goes without saying that marijuana, hemp, and their derivatives are substances,\u201d the agency said. \u201cHence, to the extent that they may be delivered to an inhaling user through an aerosolized solution, they and the related delivery systems, parts, components, liquids, and accessories clearly fall within the [Preventing Online Sales of E-Cigarettes to Children Act\u2019s] scope.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other commenters argued that USPS shouldn\u2019t impose the restriction on cannabis products because the ban could conflict with state or local marijuana laws\u2014or because Congress has approved spending legislation that prohibits the use of Justice Department funds for interfering in state-legal medical cannabis programs.<\/p>\n<p>USPS said those arguments are not valid because, 1) it\u2019s part of the federal government and is, therefore, unaffected by state or local marijuana policies and 2) it\u2019s not part of the Justice Department, which is the only branch of the government restricted by the state protection rider in appropriations legislation.<\/p>\n<p>The agency further clarified that hemp containing up to 0.3 percent THC is federally legal and is generally mailable, but only \u201cto the extent that they are not incorporated into an ENDS product or function as a component of one.\u201d As such, while business can generally mail out legal hemp-derived products, that\u2019s only the case if they are not vaping products covered under the new law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">\u201cThe POSECCA and the Agriculture Improvement Act overlap, but they do not conflict. The Agriculture Improvement Act merely excludes certain products from the CSA. It does not affirmatively declare hemp and hemp derivatives to be mailable in any and all circumstances, superseding all other relevant laws (such as the POSECCA). For its part, the POSECCA restricts the mailability of only certain hemp-based and related products; hemp-based non-ENDS products are unaffected, as are ENDS products falling within one of the PACT Act\u2019s exceptions. That Congress has rendered some subset of a class of goods to be nonmailable while leaving the remainder mailable is not some sort of legal conflict, but, rather, how mailability regulation typically works.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There are limited exceptions to the new mailing rule. Vapes can be shipped within the states of Alaska and Hawaii; verified businesses can mail vapes between each other or to government agencies; companies can send products for consumer testing or public health purposes; and individuals can ship up to 10 ENDS for non-commercial use per 30-day period. Beyond that, it is generally prohibited for a company to send a vaping device to a consumer via U.S. mail.<\/p>\n<p>Some commenters argued that CBD products could fall under the health exemption to the general ban, but USPS said that would not apply unless and until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves any such products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">\u201cThe FDA likewise has not approved any ENDS product for therapeutic delivery of any non-nicotine substance, including, in particular, CBD or other substances derived from marijuana. Once again, except for hemp-derived CBD containing no more than 0.3 percent THC by dry weight, cannabis and cannabis derivatives remain nonmailable under the Controlled Substances Act regardless of the POSECCA and notwithstanding any State or local laws on \u2018medical\u2019 marijuana\u2026 Far from taking marketing claims of therapeutic benefit at face value, the FDA has undertaken enforcement action against companies making such claims about CBD and other cannabis-related products absent new drug approvals from the FDA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Vaping advocates say the final USPS rules confirm concerns they have long voiced as Congress considered enacting the ban.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUSPS never asked Congress to hand them a new unfunded mandate. The reality is Congress set the overly expansive language and USPS was and is statutorily obliged to apply the law as they wrote it,\u201d Gregory Conley, president of the American Vaping Association, told Marijuana Moment. \u201cSince we anticipate it will take the USPS months or years to move businesses through the application process to allow B2B sales, further supply chain issues among independents will likely follow.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOf course, there remains an open question around how vigorously the law will be enforced, particularly around products that lack state or federal excise taxes,\u201d he said. \u201cPunishments for violating the law can be swift and severe, so retailers should think carefully about trading a short-term buck for potential legal troubles before a federal judge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By preventing vape manufacturers and retailers from utilizing USPS to ship their goods, the regulations will effectively force them to use more expensive private courier services\u2014a cost that will likely be passed on to consumers.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GzhyWIOssE\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/fda-will-search-reddit-to-learn-about-effects-of-cbd-and-emerging-cannabinoids-like-delta-8-thc\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">FDA Will Search Reddit To Learn About Effects Of CBD And \u2018Emerging\u2019 Cannabinoids Like Delta-8 THC<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p \/>\n<p><em>Photo courtesy of <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:USPS_Delivery_Truck_in_Washington_DC.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wikimedia\/Kevin Payravi<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes\/\" target=\"_blank\">USPS Releases Final Rule Banning Mailing Of Hemp, CBD And Marijuana Vapes<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\" target=\"_blank\">Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&#013;<br \/>\n&#013;<br \/>\nRead More: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marijuanamoment.net\/usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">USPS Releases Final Rule Banning Mailing Of Hemp, CBD And Marijuana Vapes<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) on Wednesday released its final rule on the mailability of vapes, asserting that even devices designed for federally legal hemp derivatives like CBD generally cannot be shipped through the U.S. mail. The agency has been developing the regulations to comply with a bill passed by<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/2021\/10\/20\/usps-releases-final-rule-banning-mailing-of-hemp-cbd-and-marijuana-vapes\/\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":458,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50618"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/458"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50618"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50619,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50618\/revisions\/50619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}