The U.S. Supreme Court is getting more pressure to take up a case on the legality of establishing safe injection sites where people can use illicit drugs in a medically supervised environment, with attorneys general from 10 states and D.C. filing an amicus brief urging the justices to take action.<\/p>\n
Representatives from 14 cities and counties, as well as the mayor of Philadelphia, which is at the center of the current case, also\u00a0 filed amici briefs in support of the case in recent days.<\/p>\n
The attorneys general of Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Virginia, plus Washington, D.C., told the Supreme Court in the brief last week that safe consumption facilities are \u201cemerging as a promising measure to save lives and to fill a time-sensitive gap in medical care.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Amici States are battling a nationwide opioid crisis that claims over 130 lives every day,\u201d the top prosecutors said. \u201cThey are on the front lines of this public health emergency, fighting to save their citizens from overdose deaths. As a result, they share a strong interest in ensuring that multiple, effective interventions are available to address the epidemic, to prevent opioid use disorder, and to treat those suffering from opioid dependence.\u201d<\/p>\n
The brief cites research showing that the harm reduction services can mitigate overdose deaths and help people enter into treatment.<\/p>\n
\nNEW: As our country struggles with the opioid crisis, states must be free to use tools like safe injection sites. I led 11 AGs in encouraging the Supreme Court to hear this case and support Safehouse, because medical supervision can save lives.https:\/\/t.co\/PBN5K7rUj3<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 AG Karl A. Racine (@AGKarlRacine) September 27, 2021<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\u201cThe COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated the opioid crisis, taking the lives of far too many Americans, including District residents who continue to overdose,\u201d D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine (D), who led the brief, said<\/a> in a press release.<\/p>\n
Many of the attorney general who are now calling on the Supreme Court to take up the supervised consumption case also joined a brief earlier this year in a separate federal case involving access to psilocybin for cancer patients<\/a>.<\/p>\n
The harm reduction case at hand, meanwhile, concerns the nonprofit organization Safehouse, which was set to launch a safe consumption site in Philadelphia before being blocked by a legal challenge from the Trump administration. It filed a petition with the nation\u2019s highest court last month<\/a>\u00a0to hear the case.<\/p>\n
Beyond the states\u2019 brief, local officials in cities and counties across the U.S. are also imploring the Supreme Court to take up a review of the matter.<\/p>\n
Signatories include counsel for Albuquerque, New Mexico; Austin, Texas; Chicago, Illinois; New York City, New York; Oakland, California; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; San Diego, California; San Francisco, California; Seattle, Washington; Somerville, Massachusetts; King County, Washington; Los Angeles County, California; Multnomah County, Oregon; and Washtenaw County, Michigan.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is ever-stronger evidence that overdose-prevention sites can reduce the mortality caused by this epidemic and produce significant community benefits in public health and safety,\u201d the local officials wrote<\/a>. \u201cSites like the one Safehouse proposes also further federal public health policy, as they advance the objectives and methods recommended by multiple federal agencies.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe promise of overdose-prevention sites is not an empty one, nor a hypothetical one. It is based on facts, research, and real-world precedent,\u201d they continued. \u201cOverdose-prevention sites would help stop\u2014or at the least, slow\u2014the loss of lives in amici\u2019s communities.\u201d<\/p>\n
Local officials from Somerville separately participated in a hearing on Monday before the Massachusetts state legislature\u2019s Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery on bills to decriminalize drug possession and legalize safe consumption sites. The official said there are plans in the work to launch a safe injection facility<\/a> in the jurisdiction. And they want to see the statewide bill pass to provide additional protections against being federally penalized.<\/p>\n
Another recent amicus brief came from Philadelphia Mayor James Kenney (D), who argued that the \u201cbenefits of overdose prevention sites are well studied and well documented: they save lives, provide a valuable gateway to treatment, and reduce other harms associated with opioid use.\u201d<\/p>\n
A coalition of 80 current and former prosecutors and law enforcement officials\u2014including one who is President Joe Biden\u2019s pick for U.S. attorney of Massachusetts\u2014previously filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Safehouse\u2019s safe injection case<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Fair and Justice Prosecution, the group that coordinated the amicus brief, also\u00a0organized a tour of Portugal for 20 top prosecutors<\/a>\u00a0in 2019 so they could learn about the successful implementation of the country\u2019s drug decriminalization law.<\/p>\n
If the Supreme Court were to take up the case and rule in favor of Safehouse, it could embolden advocates and lawmakers across the country to pursue the harm reduction policy.<\/p>\n
The governor of Rhode Island signed a bill in July to\u00a0establish a safe consumption site pilot program<\/a>\u00a0where people could test and use currently illicit drugs in a medically supervised environment. It became the first state in the country to legalize the harm reduction centers. It\u2019s not clear whether the Department of Justice will seek to intervene to prevent the opening of such facilities in that state.<\/p>\n
Massachusetts lawmakers\u00a0advanced similar legislation last year<\/a>, but it was not ultimately enacted.<\/p>\n
A similar harm reduction bill in California, sponsored by Sen. Scott Wiener (D), was approved in the state Senate in April, but further action has been delayed until 2022.<\/p>\n
At the same time that Safehouse is turning to the Supreme Court, it also announced recently that it will be returning the the federal district court that gave it an initial 2019 victory in support of establishing a safe injection facility before it was overturned in the appeals court.<\/p>\n
The organization is making the unique argument that the federal government\u2019s decision to block it from providing the service violates religious freedom by subjecting participants \u201cto criminal penalties for exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs that they have an obligation to do everything possible to preserve life and to provide shelter and care to the vulnerable, including those suffering from addiction.\u201d<\/p>\n
In 2018, a congressional subcommittee approved legislation to specifically prohibit Washington D.C. from using local tax dollars\u00a0to help open safe consumption facilities<\/a>. But that provision was not enacted and has not been reintroduced since.<\/p>\n
A 2020 study found that people \u201cwho reported using supervised injection facilities on an at least weekly basis\u00a0had a reduced risk of dying<\/a>\u00a0compared to those who reported less than weekly or no use of this health service.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nIRS Official Offers Tax Advice To Marijuana Businesses And Says Feds Expect Industry To Keep Growing<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
The post 10 State Attorneys General And Multiple City Officials Tell Supreme Court To Hear Safe Injection Case For Drug Harm Reduction<\/a> appeared first on Marijuana Moment<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n
\nRead More: 10 State Attorneys General And Multiple City Officials Tell Supreme Court To Hear Safe Injection Case For Drug Harm Reduction<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The U.S. Supreme Court is getting more pressure to take up a case on the legality of establishing safe injection sites where people can use illicit drugs in a medically supervised environment, with attorneys general from 10 states and D.C. filing an amicus brief urging the justices to take action.Continue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":458,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50181"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/458"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50181"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50182,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50181\/revisions\/50182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}