After months of speculation, California\u2019s marijuana regulators have released a draft of their final regulations for state\u2019s burgeoning cannabis industry, following a seven month period where the state was operating under \u201cemergency regulations.\u201d<\/p>\n
Last Friday, California released its final rules for every aspect of the cannabis industry<\/a>\u00a0and commenced a 45-day public comment period. There are plenty of hits and misses in the plan. For example, advocates are excited to see the elimination of certain unneeded redundancies in paperwork for duly licensed companies providing to both the recreational and medical markets, but simultaneously are much less excited about the exit bag requirement.<\/p>\n Perhaps the most unexpected rule in the regulations is a ban on giant vaporizers that could be used to dispense cannabis in the air throughout an event\u2019s premises. At the very least, this means you won\u2019t be able to smoke blunts and legally have a giant vape cannon on the same premises in California anymore.<\/p>\n Overall, multiple experts told Cannabis Now that they were pleased with the new regulations, after seeing a lot of what they were looking for in the new guidelines from the Bureau of Cannabis Control. According to the California Cannabis Industry Association<\/a>, the regulations are favorable to cannabis businesses because the industry attempted to stay as involved in the drafting process as they could be.<\/p>\n \u201cThe reciprocal educational process that California\u2019s cannabis industry has been involved in with our state\u2019s licensing authorities is paying off,\u201d CCIA Communications and Outreach Director Josh Drayton told Cannabis Now. \u201cCCIA has taken the emergency rule-making process as an opportunity to strengthen the relationship between cannabis operators and our regulating bodies. We\u2019ve hosted tours of commercial cannabis facilities for lawmakers and regulators, providing an opportunity for the state to engage with the industry and create solutions that streamline operations for businesses while prioritizing public safety and health.\u201d<\/p>\n In Drayton\u2019s eyes, one of the biggest challenges faced by the California<\/a> cannabis industry in this new era was over the \u201cadult\u201d or \u201cmedical\u201d designations that companies were receiving.<\/p>\n \u201cThe A or M designation was causing bottlenecks in the supply chain, was doubling application and licensing fees and was crippling an industry that is trying to come into compliance,\u201d said Drayton. \u201cCCIA worked tirelessly at the State Capitol to merge the A and M designation, which we saw in the re-adopt of the emergency regulations. Although this change happened prior to the release of the draft regulations, we believe that this change will benefit all sectors of the industry.\u201d<\/p>\n Drayton said CCIA is currently focused on critically examining all of the changes in the draft permanent regulations, \u201cbut we are receiving positive feedback from our membership on a few of the key changes.\u201d<\/p>\n The nation\u2019s oldest dispensary, Berkeley Patients Group<\/a>, was one of the many retail organizations whose staff spent their weekend pouring over the regulations. We asked BPG\u2019s Director of Government Affairs Sabrina Fendrick how satisfied she was with what she saw on a scale of one to 10.<\/p>\n \u201cAbout a seven and a half,\u201d she said, though she noted this was her preliminary reaction. \u201cIt was really good to see A licensees can work with M licensees \u2014 that will be good for moving more product through the supply chain since there is already a shortage of licensees due to local regulations and local prohibitions. Having the separation of only having to work with either A or M licensees would have further hindered the supply chain.\u201d<\/p>\n Fendrick said the adult-use market and medical market should be treated similarly, except at the cash register because \u201cit\u2019s the same product moving all the way through and it saves on administration costs.\u201d<\/p>\n Drayton hit on the controversial topic of exit bags and gave the manufacturers perspective and why they were happy to see that language included.<\/p>\n \u201cOur manufacturers have voiced strong support for child-resistant packaging requirements being met at the retail level with opaque exit packaging,\u201d said Drayton. \u201cThe emergency packaging requirements have left many manufacturing companies struggling to come into compliance on a very short timeline. This suggested change will streamline packaging operations for all companies.\u201d<\/p>\n While Drayton admitted to understanding the environmental concerns on exit bags, he said they\u2019re a temporary solution and everyone involved in the process needs to continue the conversation on how to create reasonable child-resistant packaging standards \u201cthat don\u2019t wreak havoc on the environment.\u201d<\/p>\n According to page 9 of the Bureau of Cannabis Control\u2019s regulations,<\/a> \u201cThe exit packaging will make it more difficult for young children to gain access to the commercial cannabis goods.\u201d But it would hard to see how that argument would work at events where vendors will also be forced to use the exit bags, despite no children being on the premises. In those cases, you\u2019ll be able to rip the bag open and spark the contents legally without moving at all.<\/p>\n Fendrick said she was the least excited to see the BCC mandate that dispensaries put all products in resealable childproof exit bags. \u201cAside from the fact it\u2019s a complete 180 from what we\u2019ve been working off of and trying to educate manufacturers and cultivators on what was compliant, I think the environmental concerns that come from every single dispensary having to put products in an exit bag is going to be\u2026 We don\u2019t even know what kind of environmental repercussions this is going to cause,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Fendrick said when she asked BPG\u2019s director of operations how many exit bags they were going through a month, he told her that they were using a pallet.<\/p>\n \u201cIt takes a forklift to move a pallet, and that\u2019s one dispensary in one month,\u201d said Fendrick.<\/p>\n Another notable rule in California\u2019s final regulations is the fact that local municipalities won\u2019t be able to ban cannabis delivery services.<\/p>\n \u201cThis final interpretation will formally give patients and consumers the access to cannabis that they voted for in Prop 64,\u201d said Drayton. CCIA had previously supported SB 1302, which would have done the same thing, but should the regulations hold up, the bill wouldn\u2019t be necessary.<\/p>\n Jesse Stout, a cannabis industry attorney on the San Francisco State Cannabis Legalization Task Force, agreed that access for all Californians to cannabis at their doorstep was a big victory.<\/p>\n \u201cThe bureau\u2019s proposed regulations also add a new subsection\u2026 that says \u2018a delivery employee may deliver to any jurisdiction within the State of California,\u2019\u201d Stout said. \u201cSome local jurisdictions had wanted to prevent Californians from receiving deliveries at their own homes; I am optimistic that this change will deter such prohibitions.\u201d<\/p>\n Stout was also pleased to see the BCC clarify the requirements for cannabis companies to demonstrate compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).<\/p>\n \u201cThe emergency regulations previously required some license applicants to prepare CEQA compliance documentation, without specifying whether or how the bureau would approve it,\u201d Stout said. \u201cThe proposed regular regulations spell out exactly what information these applicants will need to give the bureau, and the standards for the bureau to evaluate this information.\u201d<\/p>\n TELL US,<\/strong> what do you think of California\u2019s new regulations?<\/p>\n The post The Best & Worst of California\u2019s Proposed Permanent Cannabis Regulations<\/a> appeared first on Cannabis Now<\/a>.<\/p>\n
After months of speculation, California\u2019s marijuana regulators have released a draft of their final regulations for state\u2019s burgeoning cannabis industry, following a seven month period where the state was operating under \u201cemergency regulations.\u201d Last Friday, California released its final rules for every aspect of the cannabis industry\u00a0and commenced a 45-dayContinue Reading<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"false","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4671,4064,148,3471,50,2456,4969,139,81,162],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27873"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27874,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27873\/revisions\/27874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannabiscultivatornews.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Adult-Use & Medical Industries to Coexist<\/h4>\n
Environmental Concerns Over Exit Bag Requirement<\/h4>\n
Cannabis Delivery Allowed Statewide<\/h4>\n
\n
\nRead More: The Best & Worst of California\u2019s Proposed Permanent Cannabis Regulations<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"